Reviewer Guidelines

Articles published in the Journal of Teacher Wellbeing undergo thorough peer review and support COPE guidelines for reviewers. Journals may operate different peer review processes. Our guide to understanding peer review outlines several different peer review models, including:

• Single anonymous peer review
• Double anonymous peer review

Journal of Teacher Wellbeing publishes a statement explaining the peer review model used by the journal on the journal's homepage. A minimum of two independent reviewers is usually required for each research article. The goals and scope of each journal will outline their peer review policies in detail.

Detailed comments, as well as overall recommendations from peer reviewers, will be considered by the Editor when making a decision. However, the ultimate responsibility for acceptance or rejection rests with the Editor.

Please note that the Journal of Teacher Wellbeing does not allow the recommendation of peer reviewers.

Confidentiality of peer review

Maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of the peer review process and editorial decision-making at all stages is required, complying with data protection regulations. Invited reviewers must declare a competing interest before submitting their report to the journal. Suppose they wish to engage colleagues as co-reviewers for an article. In that case, they should check with the journal's editorial office before sharing the manuscript and include their names, affiliations, and relevant competing interests in comments to the Editor when they return their report.

In investigating ethical questions, submitted manuscripts, authors, reviewers, and others will be treated confidentially. During the investigation, the editor may need to share information with third parties, such as the author's ethics committee and institution

Author Guidelines

Manuscript template refer to APA 7^th edition.

Structure

Your paper should be compiled in the following order: title page; abstract; keywords; main text introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion; acknowledgments; declaration of interest statement; references; appendices (as appropriate); table(s) with caption(s) (on individual pages); figures; figure captions (as a list).

Word limits

Please include a word count for your paper.

A typical paper for this journal should be between 6000 and 8000 words, inclusive of:

• Tables
• Figure or table captions

Format Submission

This journal uses an article template which can be downloaded at the following 

Checklist: what to include

1. Author details. Please ensure all authors listed meet the Journal of Teacher Well-Being authorship criteria. All manuscript authors must include their full name and affiliation on the cover page. Please also include ORCiD. One author must be identified as the corresponding author, with their email address usually displayed in articles and online articles. Author affiliation is the affiliation where the research was conducted. If one of the named co-authors changes affiliations during the peer review process, the new affiliation may be provided as a footnote. Please note that changes to affiliation cannot be made once your paper has been accepted.
2. Must contain an unstructured abstract of 200 words. Read tips for writing your abstract.
3. You may choose to include a video abstract with your article. Find out how this can help your work reach a wider audience and what to think about when making a film.
4. five keywords or less. Read to make your articles easier to find, including information about title selection and search engine optimization.
5. Funding details. Please provide all details required by your funding agency and grant provider as follows:
For single-agency grants
This work was supported by [Funding Agency] under Grant [number xxxx]. For grants from several institutions, this work was supported by [Funding Agency #1] under Grant [number xxxx], [Funding Body #2] under Grant [number xxxx], and [Funding Body #3] under Grant [number xxxx].
6. Disclosure statement. This is to acknowledge any financial or non-financial interests arising from the direct application of your research. If there are no relevant competing interests to declare, please state this in the article; for example, The author reports no competing interests to declare—further guidance on what constitutes a conflict of interest and how to disclose it.
8. Numbers. Images should be high quality (1200 dpi for line art, 600 dpi for grayscale, and 300 dpi for color, at the right size). Images must be provided in one of our preferred file formats: EPS, PS, JPEG, TIFF, or Microsoft Word (DOC or DOCX) files are acceptable for images drawn in Word.
9. Table. Tables should present new information and keep what is in the text. The reader must be able to interpret the table without referring to the text. Please provide editable files.
10. Equation. If you submit your manuscript as a word document, ensure the equations are editable advice.

Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts are initially read by the editorial team. The manuscripts that do not meet to journal’s criteria will be rejected without further peer-review. The manuscripts that meet the journal’s criteria will be sent to reviewers (double-blind peer review). The Editor-in-Chief assigns generally two reviewers to evaluate the manuscript. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer’s comments and recommendations as follows: Accept Submission, Revision Required, Resubmit for Review, Decline Submission.

The Editor-in-Chief Of Journal of Well Being has full authority to decide which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.
 review process.

The review process consists of the following steps: