Political Memes as a Medium for Criticism on Platform X

Authors

  • Dyah Ayu Novita INDONESIA State University of Surabaya, Surabaya
    Competing Interests

    The author declares no competing interests.

  • Navia Rehan Andien Rizkya INDONESIA University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Surabaya
    Competing Interests

    The author declares no competing interests.

  • Hannif Ristiana Shiva EG Al Azhar University, Cairo
    Competing Interests

    The author declares no competing interests.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64595/wasathiyah.v1n2.p145-158

Keywords:

Social criticism, Semiotics, X platform

Abstract

Political memes have become an increasingly common form of political communication on social media, yet previous studies have paid less attention to how memes construct criticism of government priorities in relation to socioeconomic conditions and perceived public needs. This study aims to examine how political memes on X construct such criticism through Charles Sanders Peirce’s semiotic framework. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyze five political memes purposively selected from publicly available posts on X between August 2025 and March 2026. The memes were selected based on their use of combined visual and textual elements to criticize government policies, political figures, or related political issues. The analysis focused on the relationship between the representamen, object, and interpretant in each meme. The findings show that political criticism is constructed through numerical comparisons, policy juxtaposition, irony, cultural references, visual incongruity, and symbolic contrasts. These signs connect government policies and priorities with issues of economic inequality, public policy benefits, environmental concerns, energy-sector power, and differences between officials and ordinary citizens. The study contributes to political communication research by showing how Peircean semiotics can explain the construction of political criticism in memes, while also demonstrating how memes connect policy debates with everyday public concerns in digital public discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarts, N. (2013). Networks of outrage and hope—Social movements in the Internet age. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt020

Abdurrahman, A. (2026). Social media and political protest: Framing and agenda-setting in the Indonesian demonstrations, August 2025. Online Information Review, 50(3), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2025-0809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2025-0809

Anita Kristina, Auliyah Elsa Tsaniyah, & Kamsin, K. (2026). Veblenian Consumption in the Digital Age: Self-Image, Social Status, and the Performance of Distinction. The Journal of Society and Media, 10(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v10n1.p58-77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v10n1.p58-77

Bany Mohammed, A., Al-Okaily, M., Qasim, D., Ur Rehman, S., & Abdalla, L. (2025). Digital activism and public opinion: Understanding the role of social media during the Gaza Conflict. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(11), 3366–3393. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-03-2024-0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-03-2024-0101

Cabrera, N. L., Matias, C. E., & Montoya, R. (2017). Activism or slacktivism? The potential and pitfalls of social media in contemporary student activism. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(4), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000061

Chaney, D., & Philippe, D. (2026). Defending heritage in the digital age: Polyphonic discourses and the reconfiguration of protest spaces in tourism activism. Annals of Tourism Research, 118, 104162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2026.104162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2026.104162

Chen, W., & Wang, Y. (2025). Contagious media mobilization: The dynamics of anti-harassment activism on campus. Women’s Studies International Forum, 111, 103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103118

Conner, J. O. (2023). Social movements and college student activism. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) (pp. 398–407). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.08069-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.08069-6

Creswell, J. (2019). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif dan campuran.

Dashti, A. A., Gaither, T. K., Al-Kandari, A., Murad, H. A., Almutari, T. M., & Alqahtani, R. (2023). Women’s activism as public relations in a patriarchal society: The case of Kuwait. Public Relations Review, 49(4), 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102350

Elwood, S. (2025). Computational urbanisms & insurgent mediations of the city: Stop the Sweeps. Digital Geography and Society, 9, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100145

Emordi, A., F.B., B., & Ibukunoluwa Ruth Olufemi. (2026). Governmental Political Policy and Out-of-School Children in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Religion, Local Politics, and Law, 2(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.64595/jrlpl.v2n2.p214-228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64595/jrlpl.v2n2.p214-228

Etim, E., Fatile, J. O., Duke, J. E., Ibikunle, B. Q., & Duru, E. J. C. (2025). Digital activism and collective resistance to police brutality: Systematic review of the quieter and less visible narratives of #EndSARS protest. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101722

Fauzi, A. M., Maliha, N. F., Handoyo, P., Hanindraputri, E. K., & Ladiqi, S. (2025). Santri Community, Charisma, and the Contrast Political Agency: Electoral Victory and Defeat in Jombang and Mojokerto, Indonesia. Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 5(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.53754/xzzh8v16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53754/xzzh8v16

Fauzi, A., Sudrajat, A., Affandi, A., & Raditya, A. (2018). Maintaining Identity Political Culture In Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953, 012185. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012185

Gaidos, A., Aumais, N., & Germain, O. (2026). #Balancetastartup: Digital feminist activism and backlash in entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 32(7), 1912–1930. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2025-0162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2025-0162

Han, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). When digital feminisms collide with nationalism: Theorizing “pink feminism” on Chinese social media. Women’s Studies International Forum, 105, 102941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102941

Hossain, M. A., Mitu, T. A., Asa, L. A., Zafar, A., Nisha, A. A., & Sarker, M. F. H. (2026). From hashtags to resistance: Social media as a catalyst for political mobilisation in Bangladesh. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 14, 103244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103244

Islam, M. A., Islam, S. M. T., & Van Staden, C. J. (2026). Social movements and country-by-country reporting: A study of multinational companies. The British Accounting Review, 58(4), 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101724

Islam, M. A., Nur, S., Mahmud, I., Rakiv, M., Nazneen Noor, R., & Moniruzzaman, M. (2025). Gen Z’s digital uprising in Bangladesh: The role of social media in the fall of a political despot. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102181

Mahjebeen, J., & Jalan, S. (2026). Ecological struggles, identity, and Gandhian praxis: Rethinking political autonomy in Ladakh. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102356

McDaniel, D. S. (2024). “We’re loud, why aren’t you?” Laura’s social media activism through justice-oriented literacies. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 23(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-12-2023-0161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-12-2023-0161

Mount, L. (2025). Between emancipatory potential and hierarchical reproduction: Social movement aspirations and class in a South Indian NGO. World Development, 196, 107134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107134

Niehoff, S., Reißig, M., & Beier, G. (2026). Aspiration, appearance, argumentation or attack? Reconstructing stakeholder engagement images of German industrial companies on social media. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 31(7), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2025-0181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2025-0181

Putri, I. R., & Pratiwi, E. (2022). Aktivisme digital dan pemanfaatan media baru sebagai pendekatan pemberdayaan masyarakat atas isu lingkungan. Bricolage : Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.30813/bricolage.v8i2.3303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30813/bricolage.v8i2.3303

Sabrina, M. & Dhiajeng Putri N. (2026). A Portrait of Self-Branding on Social Media: Understanding Islamic Values and Trends in The Digital Native Generation. Journal of Religion, Local Politics, and Law, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.64595/jrlpl.v2n1.p1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64595/jrlpl.v2n1.p1-18

Schoettler, M. (2023). “Make your feed work for you”: Tactics of feminist affective resistance on social media. Computers and Composition, 67, 102762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102762

Shrestha, K. (2026). Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media. Computers and Composition, 80, 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2026.102994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2026.102994

Vestergaard, L. K., & Schmid, B. (2026). Institutional activism within the local state: Exploring ambitions for deep transformation in Amsterdam. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 59, 101092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.101092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.101092

Vogler, R., Wurmstein, A., Schweiggart, N., & Hetsch, K. (2026). Beyond residents and tourists: Media framing of overtourism across transnational communication contexts. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 42, 101148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2026.101148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2026.101148

Widodo, S., Kristiyono, J., Aji, G. G., & Zulaikha, Z. (2026). Digital Capitalism and Platform Dependency in Indonesia: Media, Power, and Political Economy. The Journal of Society and Media, 10(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v10n1.p36-57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v10n1.p36-57

Winkler-Titus, N., & Crafford, A. (2025). Accounting for radical change: Framing in a social movement leading to a radical change decision. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 21(7), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2023-0207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2023-0207

Xie, S., & Wei, H. (2025). Left out, stay out? The impact of social exclusion on consumer engagement in brand activism. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 87, 104447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104447

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Political Memes as a Medium for Criticism on Platform X. (2026). Wasathiyah: Journal of Political Islam and Society, 1(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.64595/wasathiyah.v1n2.p145-158

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.